Site dedicated to Dima, Taj, and Saje.
Next
Part III — How God Is Moving Today41 / 79 lessons
Reading

Lesson 27 — The Doctrine of the Trinity

1h 31m

  1. 1 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY

THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY

I

Names of God in the Old Testament

We will deal with only a few names of God to show that some have no ground for believing in only one person in the Godhead and that God has more than one name.

  1. 1 ELOHIM

    This is the Hebrew word for “God” in Gen. 1:1 and 2,700 other places in the Old Testament. It is a uni-plural noun meaning “Gods” and is so translated 239 times Genesis 3:5Exodus 22:281 Samuel 4:8Daniel 2:11Daniel 4:6-9Daniel 5:11, 14. It is the plural of Eloah meaning “deity” and “God.” It is used in the plural with the definite article of the Supreme God. It is translated “judges” Exodus 21:6Exodus 22:8-9 and “angels” Psalms 8:5. Sometimes Elohim is used in connection with plural verbs and pronouns, as seen in the Hebrew text of Gen. 20:13, “the Gods they caused me to wander” and in Gen. 35:7, “there the Gods they appeared unto him.” Many times plural pronouns are used of God in referring to the different members of the Godhead, as “us” Genesis 1:26Genesis 3:22Genesis 11:7Isaiah 6:8John 17:21, “our” Genesis 1:26John 14:23, “we” John 14:23John 17:11, 22 and “their” Psalms 2:3.

First, second and third personal pronouns are used hundreds of times in Scripture of one, two, or three persons in the deity. Some of these are used of men to and concerning different members of the deity to and of each other. In Jn. 17 alone Jesus uses 162 pronouns in speaking to and of His Father. In Ps. 119 there are 610 pronouns used of man to and of God. Other chapters in the Bible have many like pronouns and they are all used right and should be understood in the same sense in connection with God as we understand them when they are used of other subjects. When the different members of deity speak to and of each other just like men do, should we accuse them of misrepresenting themselves and of not being able to properly use the human language. We have more right to believe that only one person is referred to when men use first, second, and third personal singular and plural pronouns of and to each other, as to believe there is only one person referred to when the members of the Godhead use them of and to each other.

When singular pronouns are used of deity it is one of the three persons of the Trinity speaking of Himself or as representing the whole Godhead, or it is one of the three divine persons speaking to another one concerning a third person of the Trinity as is clear in Jn. 14:16-17, 26; 15:26; 16:7-15; 17:1-25.

In the Old Testament it was the Father who was the prominent speaker Hebrews 1:1-3Acts 3:21; in the gospels the Son was the prominent speaker John 5:47John 6:33John 8:26, 28John 12:49-50John 17:8; and now it is the Holy Spirit who is the prominent speaker John 14:26John 15:26John 16:13-15Acts 2:4Acts 13:2Acts 15:28Acts 20:28.

Singular pronouns are sometimes used of the whole Godhead as a unit Exodus 20:3Isaiah 44:6, 8Isaiah 45:5, 21Isaiah 46:9Hosea 13:4, just like the whole Church as the body of Christ as a unit is spoken of as a “man” and “he” Ephesians 2:14-15Ephesians 4:13Ephesians 5:25-272 Thessalonians 2:7-8.

The one Elohim then is not one person, or one in number, but one in unity. Elohim is not a divided deity, but three persons in “one God,” or one deity. The word itself does not say there are three, but merely that deity is in the plural. God is thus referred to in the plural twice as many times as the word “Jesus” is found in both Testaments.

  1. 1 YEHOVAH

    This is the Hebrew word for “Lord” in Deut. 6:4 and 7,600 times in the Old Testament. It means “the Self-existent,” “Eternal and Immutable One,” or “Unity.” It does not tell us how many persons are in the “One [Unified] Lord,” but the Scriptures mention three persons who are called “Lord” and who are “Self-existent” and “Eternal” and therefore, all of them can all be called “Jehovah.” In Gen. 19:24; Ps. 110:1; Mt. 22:44; Zech. 2:10-11 we have the Father and the Son both called “Lord,” and Exod. 16:7 with Heb. 3:7-8 and Isa. 6:8-9 with Acts 28:25 and Exod. 17:7, with Heb. 3:7-9 and Jer. 31:31-34 with Heb. 10:15-16 prove that the Holy Spirit is also called “Lord” or “Jehovah.” See Lesson Four, Point 6, where all three are called “God.” Yehovah is rendered “Jehovah” four times Exodus 6:3Psalms 83:18Isaiah 12:2Isaiah 26:4. Jehovah is used in many compound names of deity which we shall not list here.

  1. 1 EL. This is the Hebrew word for “God” in 250 places. It means “the Strong One,” or “Elohim the Omnipotent,” while Elohim is “God the Creator,” putting His omnipotence to work. All three persons are also omnipotent, as we have seen in former lessons.
  1. 1 ELOAH

    This is the Hebrew word for “God” in 56 places. It is “Elohim who is to be worshipped.” It is the name of God when worship of idols is contrasted to worship of the true God. It is “the living God” in contrast to dead gods. It means “deity” and “God.”

  1. 1 ELYON

    This is the Hebrew word for “Most High,” and it is so translated 40 times. It means “the Supreme,” “Most High,” “Highest,” “Lofty.” It is El, the possessor of Heaven and Earth, and Elohim, the Creator of Heaven and Earth. It is translated “High” Psalms 78:35Daniel 4:2; and “higher” in referring to Jesus as God’s “firstborn” Psalms 89:27. Jesus of the New Testament is never called the Most High, but only the Son of the Most High God Mark 5:7Luke 1:32-35Luke 8:28. Angels, when Christ was born, sang to the “God in the highest,” who was not Jesus Luke 2:14. The Father is still the “head of Christ” 1 Corinthians 11:3; so He is rightfully the Most High God.

  1. 1 ADON

    This is the Hebrew word for “Lord,” and it is so translated 195 times in the Old Testament. It means “Sovereign,” “Ruler,” “Master.” Adonai is the emphatic form of Adon and is translated “Lord” 430 times in the Old Testament. It is also translated “lords” 4 times Genesis 19:2Deuteronomy 10:17Psalms 136:3Isaiah 26:13. There are two Adonais mentioned in Ps. 110:1 and referred to in the New Testament as the Father and the Son Matthew 22:44.

  1. 1 A few other names of God in the Old Testament are “JAH” Psalms 68:4, 18; “I AM THAT I AM” and “I AM” Exodus 3:13-15; “God Almighty” Exodus 6:3; “Lord God” Genesis 2:4; “Jealous” Exodus 34:14; “The Lord of Hosts” Isaiah 47:4; “Holy” Isaiah 57:15; and many other names, thus proving that the doctrine that “Jesus” is the only God and the only name of that God is unscriptural. If God said these were His names and some human beings say they are not His names, who are we to believe? Some believe that all these names are titles signifying office, rank, or relationship, but this is mere human theory and contradicts the Scriptures which say they are real names.

God’s names are found over 19,000 times in the Bible in connection with His eternal plan of creation and redemption of all things and His eternal rulership over all creations Daniel 2:44-45Daniel 7:13-14, 27Luke 1:32-331 Corinthians 15:24-28Ephesians 1:10Ephesians 2:7Revelation 5:10Revelation 11:15Revelation 22:4-5.

II. Names of God in the New Testament

  1. 1 THEOS

    This is the Greek word for “God” and is used 1,332 times in the New Testament. It means “deity” and “God,” and with the definite article means “the Supreme Deity.” The Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost are all called God, as seen in Lesson Four, Point 6.

  1. 1 KURIOS

    This is the Greek word for “Lord” and is used 672 times in the New Testament. It means “Lord,” “Master,” and “Sir” and is used of man 31 times.

  1. 1 IESOUS

    This is the Greek word for “Jesus” 979 times in the New Testament. It is the Greek form of the Hebrew Yehowshua, rendered “Joshua” 215 times in the Old Testament. Joshua of the Old Testament is called “Jesus” in the New Testament in Acts 7:45; Heb. 4:8. Jesus is never the name of the Father, or of the Spirit in either Testament, and it was not the name of the second person of the Godhead until He became man and the Son of God about 1,900 years ago. It is the human name of the Son of God, as we have seen in Lesson Twenty-one, Point VI.

  1. 1 CHRISTOS

    This is the Greek word which we translate “Christ,” and it is used 575 times in the New Testament. It literally means “anointed” and is the equivalent of the Hebrew mashiyach, translated “Messiah” twice in the Old Testament Daniel 9:24-26 and twice in the New Testament John 1:41John 4:25. Like the name “Jesus,” it has no reference to deity, but to the humanity of Jesus Christ, who became the Christ or the Anointed One thirty years after He was born in a human body and after He was named “Jesus,” as we have seen in Lesson Twenty-one, Point VI.

Other names apart from those mentioned above of God’s Son were not all true of Him until He assumed these titles. For example, He had to become man before He could be called the Son of man, the Son of God, Jesus, Christ, Lord Jesus Christ, Messiah, Emmanuel, Son of David, the Lion of the Tribe of Judah, the Lamb of God, Mediator, and many other names. Two passages Galatians 3:171 Peter 1:11 are used by some to teach that “Christ” was a name of Jesus back in Old Testament times but upon examination of them we find this is not the case. The phrase “in Christ” in Gal. 3:17 is omitted in the texts and was added by some transcriber. It is not in the R. V., Weymouth, Centenary Translation, Concordant Version, Nestle’s Greek Text, Moffatt, and many other translations. The second passage must be understood in the light of what Peter would naturally say about Jesus after He became the Christ, or the anointed of God. In referring to actions of the second person of the Trinity in Old Testament times one may speak of Christ doing them, but in reality He was not the Christ in Old Testament times when He did them. At that time, He was God but not the Son of God or the Anointed of God. Now, since He became man and “Christ” this name could be used of Him in speaking of something He did before He became the Anointed One.

  1. 1 THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY GHOST Matthew 28:191 John 5:7-8. Some people teach that these are not names and that they are mere titles, but such teaching demonstrates ignorance of human language and contradicts the Word of God. Our dictionaries and grammars call such words “nouns” or “substantives” and say that all such nouns are names. It is true that not all such are always “proper names,” or names of certain individuals. But usage in any particular instance shows whether a word becomes a “proper name” or not, that is, whether it is applied as a name to a certain person. In Mt. 28:19 it is not just any father or any son or any ghost, but it is definitely a particular “Father” and “Son” and “Holy Ghost.” The definite article “the” is used both in the Greek and English versions before each word. It is “the Father,” and “the Son,” and “the Holy Ghost.” These terms thus used and associated can apply to no other persons on Earth or in Heaven.

The term “the Father” in the New Testament is not once applied to men or to Christ or to the Holy Ghost, but only and always to the first person of the Godhead, “the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,” as in Lesson Twenty-one, Points 8, 9, and 35. The term “the Son” in the New Testament is not once applied to men, or to “the Father,” or to “the Holy Ghost,” but always to the second person of the Godhead, “the Son of the Father,” as in Point 35, Lesson Twenty-one. The term “the-Holy Ghost” is not once applied to men, or to “the Father,” or to “the Son,” but only and always to the third person of the Godhead, who proceeds from the Father and the Son, as we have seen in Lesson Twenty-five, Point VI. The fact that these terms are always spelled with capital letters like all proper names proves that they are proper names in Scripture and that it was the consensus of all Bible scholars that these terms are true and proper names.

Funk and Wagnall’s Dictionary says, “a name is the appellation by which a person or thing is known.” Webster says, “The title by which any person or thing is known or designated or is addressed.” The Greek word onoma means “the name or word by which a person or thing is called, and by which he is distinguished from all others.” The terms, “the Father” and “the Son” and “the Holy Ghost,” then, can be and are names by which the three persons in the Godhead are known and distinguished from each other. They are not the only names of each, but they are the ones used by Jesus Christ on the occasion of giving the Church the baptism formula and the authority to baptize. We need only to show here how the word “name” in the singular could be used of three persons and three names, because some argue that if there were three persons it would read “in the names of” and not “in the name of,” but this again demonstrates ignorance of how to use human language or even how to understand it.

When we send an ambassador to a foreign land, he does business in the name of and not in the names of the United States, and this does not prove there is only one state, for there are fifty separate states in the one United States. The name in the singular in Mt. 28:19 affirms the equality and oneness of the Godhead—a perfect union of three persons in “one God,” just like the name of the United States affirms the equality and oneness of the fifty states—a perfect Union. Then, too, we could speak of each of the fifty states as separate parts of the Union, as “In the name of Missouri and of Illinois, and of Ohio, etc. This also would affirm the equality and authority of the separate states in the Union. It is not necessary to add before each state the phrase “in the name,” for once it is stated in the beginning it is understood in connection with each state.

So it is in Mt. 28:19; it is not necessary to repeat “in the name” before each person, for once it is stated it is understood as applying to each person. Note other examples of this usage: “All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth” Matthew 28:18 does not have to read “All power is given unto me in Heaven and all power is given unto me in Earth,” in order to understand that all power is given in both places. We do not have to repeat “In the beginning God” to understand He also created the Earth at that time Genesis 1:1. “The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob” Acts 3:13 does not have to be changed to read the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob in order to understand that He is the God of all three men and of each one in particular.

Matthew 28:19 does not have to be changed to read in the name of the Father and in the name of the Son and in the name of the Holy Ghost to understand that each person has a name and each person is equal in the authority to baptize. Jesus knew how to use language so that He would not have to repeat “in the name” before each separate person in the Godhead. It is just as correct to say it this way as to repeat “in the name” before each name. Acts 3:13 is just as correct and is as easy to understand as Acts 7:32 where “the God of” is repeated before the names of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Jesus knew the disciples understood there were three persons in the Godhead, and He also knew everyone else in any age could understand the same and that He was referring to each of the three separate persons alike, if he would be honest and believe the plain Scriptures.

One of the most foolish arguments of some people is that “Father is not a name; so what is the name of the Father? Son is not a name; so what is the name of the Son? Holy Ghost is not a name; so what is the name of the Holy Ghost?” This is just as if one would say “Missouri is not a name; what is the name of Missouri? Illinois is not a name; what is the name of Illinois? Ohio is not a name; what is the name of Ohio? Abraham is not a name; what is the name of Abraham? Isaac is not a name; what is the name of Isaac? Jacob is not a name; what is the name of Jacob?” If a name is any word whereby any person or thing is known, “the Father” and “the Son” and “the Holy Ghost” are names just as much as “Missouri,” “Abraham,” or any other. It does not have to be a name that would harmonize with some false doctrine in order to be a name.

Any two persons such as father and son can call each other by these names and never use any other name to address each other, to themselves, or to others. This is true not only of men, but also of God the Father and God the Son. Not once in addressing the Father did Jesus use any name but “Father” Matthew 11:25-27Matthew 26:39, 42Mark 14:36Luke 11:2Luke 23:34, 46John 12:27-28John 17:1-25, and not once in addressing the Son did the Father use any name but “Son” Matthew 3:16-17Matthew 17:5John 12:28.

Jesus many times uses the name “Father” in referring to God before others. In speaking of the name of the Father, He assumed that the disciples knew full well whom He referred to. They also knew whom He referred to as “the Holy Ghost,” for they had heard much about Him as coming to take the place of Jesus John 14:16-17, 26John 16:7-15John 20:22Acts 1:1-8Matthew 10:1, 20Matthew 12:28-32. John the Baptist taught them about the Holy Ghost even before Jesus appeared Matthew 3:11John 1:32-34. They knew the Father was a separate person from the Son and Spirit, for Jesus referred to God as “Father” 181 times, and later the disciples called Him “Father” 78 times, and not once is He confused with, or called “Jesus” or “the Holy Ghost.” They knew the Son was a separate person from the Father and the Holy Ghost, for Jesus distinguished between Himself and the Father 110 times; God the Father Himself did so ten times; demons did ten times; and the disciples themselves later did 85 times; and not once did any of them confuse the Father and Son and Holy Ghost, or call the Son “the Father” or “the Holy Ghost.”

Jesus spoke of the Spirit 24 times as being a separate person from Himself and the Father (See Lesson Twenty-five). Bible writers speak of the Spirit as being a separate person from the Father and Son about 170 times. Not once is the Spirit called “the Father” or “the Son,” and not once is He confused with them as being the same person. Thus “the Father” is a name designating Him to be a separate person from “the Son” and “the Spirit”; “the Son” is a name designating Him to be a separate person from “the Father” and “the Spirit”; and “the Holy Ghost” is a name designating Him to be a separate person from “the Father” and “the Son.”

“In the name of” is a phrase denoting “by the authority of.” Webster says, in the name of, is given as an invocation, adjuration, etc., originally of divine or holy persons or things; as, “In the name of God, Amen”; in the name of common sense, consider. In behalf of, by the authority of; as in the name of the law.” This latter is the sense in which Jesus and many Bible writers used it.

“In the name of Jesus Christ” means by the authority of Jesus Christ Acts 2:38Acts 4:10Acts 16:161 Corinthians 5:41 Corinthians 6:11Ephesians 5:201 Thessalonians 3:6; “In the name of David” means by the authority of David 1 Samuel 25:5-9; “In the name of Paul” means by the authority of Paul 1 Corinthians 1:13-15; “In the name of the Lord” means by the authority of the Lord Deuteronomy 18:5-7, 22Deuteronomy 21:5; “In the name of the Lord of Hosts” means by the authority of the Lord of Hosts 1 Samuel 17:45; “In my Father’s name” means by the authority of my Father John 5:43John 10:25John 17:12; and “In my name” means by the authority of my name Mark 16:17John 14:12-15, 26John 15:16John 16:23-26.

“By the name of” means the same as “in the name of” Acts 4:10, 30; speaking “in the name of” Acts 4:17-18Acts 5:28, 40Acts 8:12Acts 9:27-29 means the same as in the Old Testament, “by the authority of” the one who sent the speaker Jeremiah 20:9Jeremiah 26:9-20; and “In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” means we are to baptize by the authority of the Father and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost and not in the name of the Son only. If we baptize in the name of the Son only, we rob the Father and the Holy Ghost of their rightful authority in their part of redemption which baptism symbolizes. We also directly transgress the last commandment of Jesus before He went away, and we set aside His own authority that He said He had received in Heaven and Earth Matthew 28:18. If He had the authority to command men to baptize this way and He, Himself never authorized a change, then that authority still holds, and to reject it is to reject Jesus Christ.

Those who believe that Jesus is the only God should not reject and contradict the authority of Jesus. They should try some way to harmonize the book of Acts with obedience to Mt. 28:19. Similarly, if one were authorized to do a job in the name of J. C. Penny and Co. and of Sears Roebuck and Co. and of Montgomery Ward and Co., and if he really did what was authorized in the name of J. C. Penny and Co. only, rejecting the other two companies because “in the name” was not added before each name, he would be robbing the other two companies of their rightful recognition and authority. Would this do away with two of these three companies, or make all three companies only one company? So in Mt. 28:19 we have the full authority of the whole Godhead and of each member of the Godhead in particular. Refusal on the part of some to recognize more than one of three persons involved does not do away with two of them, or make them only one person.

In Acts 2:38; 8:16; 10:48; 19:5 we have emphasis given to the authority of Jesus, who is only one of the three persons of the Godhead, for it was His authority only that was being rejected by the Jews at that time. They did not question the authority of the Father or the Spirit, for they believed and accepted their authority, but to accept the authority of Jesus as they did that of God was another thing entirely. The apostles as described in the book of Acts merely demanded that the Jews accept the name of Jesus and be baptized, saved, healed and do other things authorized in the name of Jesus, or by His authority, but in no passage do they reject or change Mt. 28:19 and say in the name of Jesus only. There is not one place in Scripture where they demand of the Jews to accept Jesus as the only God and the only authority, but they were commanded to accept Him like they did God.

To baptize in the name of Jesus only in preference to the authorization given in Mt. 28:19 upon the basis of mere inference that because all three names are not used in Acts they are not to be used, is subject to the judgment of God. Cannot Mt. 28:19 be obeyed as well as Acts? We could not obey both if we followed some sects, but we can and we must obey both if we obey God, for both Matthew and Acts are the Word of God, and both must be obeyed 2 Timothy 3:16-17. Anyone obeying Mt. 28:19 automatically obeys Acts, but to interpret and obey Acts to mean that we should baptize in the name of Jesus only, is to disobey Mt. 28:19. In other words, in baptizing by the authority of the three in Mt. 28:19, we automatically obey Acts, but if we baptize by the authority of Jesus only we dishonor the other two in Mt. 28:19 and we become direct transgressors of Mt. 28:19. Obeying Acts and disobeying Mt. 28:19 is not excusable to intelligent people. Even if we were to obey Acts only as the true mode of baptism, then which passage in Acts shall we take as the true baptism formula, for all passages differ in wording?

The “Jesus-only” sect, who contend that baptism should be only in Jesus’ name, and who deceitfully prey upon honest and ignorant souls, may claim they obey Mt. 28:19, but they never obey it; they never recognize it in baptism; and they always re-baptize those who have been baptized according to Mt. 28:19. If they claim to obey Mt. 28:19, then insist that they baptize you this way and see how they back down in their claim and see a concrete example of deliberate rejection of part of the Bible. Could not Jesus have said in Mt. 28:19 what Jesus-only people teach, if that is really what He meant to say? If He did not say what they teach, then that is not what He means, and we had better reject their fallacy on baptism and obey Mt. 28:19. We must either reject this false teaching or reject God. One cannot believe and obey both, for they are just the opposite of each other.

The preposition “of” and the conjunction “and” repeated each time before each of the three names in Mt. 28:19 further prove three separate persons. If one would say “a gift of John and of James and of George” he means a gift from three persons, not one. Jesus did not say baptize upon the authority of His name only, but also in the name of, or by the authority of, the Father and of the Holy Ghost. He did not tell them to do this until He came back in ten days as the Holy Ghost, as Jesus-only people teach, but He did say, “Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you . . . even unto the end of the world.” There would have been no better time than right here for Jesus to have frankly told the disciples that He was the only God and the Father and the Holy Ghost and all of God, but instead He revealed three separate persons in the Godhead.

  1. 1 EVERLASTING FATHER

    Some sects argue that “Father” is not a name; yet they certainly contend that “the everlasting Father” is a name of Jesus and try to prove by this that Jesus is “the Father” of the New Testament Isaiah 9:6-7. Ancient Hebrews and Greeks and other oriental people call anyone who is the originator of a custom, or who has some peculiarity or habit that distinguished him from others, the father of that custom, or the child of that habit. Thus Satan is called “father of lies” because he originated them John 8:44. Jabal is called “the father of tent dwellers” because he originated that mode of life Genesis 4:20-21. Abraham is called “the father of circumcision” because it started with him Romans 4:12. God is called “the Father of mercies” because He is merciful 2 Corinthians 1:3. Men are called “children of disobedience” and “children of wrath” because they live in disobedience and are destined to wrath Ephesians 2:2-3Ephesians 13:38Luke 16:8Colossians 3:62 Samuel 7:10Job 41:34.

The term “the everlasting Father” literally means “the Father of eternity,” “the planner of the ages,” or “the giver of eternal life” as in Heb. 1:2 (margin); Jn. 3:15-18; 6:54, 68; 10:28; 14:6; 17:2-3; Rom. 5:21; 1 Jn. 1:2; 5:11. The Son is called this because He died to impart eternal life to others, and because it was through Him the Father of the New Testament planned the ages as well as gives eternal life. He is not the only person in the Godhead that could be called this, for both the Father and the Spirit also give life and had a part in the plan of God Romans 6:231 Peter 5:10John 3:15-18John 15:24, 26John 17:3Romans 8:2, 10Galatians 6:8.

The reason the Son is called this in Isa. 9:6-7 is to state some marks of divinity in connection with the Son that was to be born, so that men would recognize that He is as much God in nature as are the Father and Spirit. If there had been no marks of divinity in the prophecies concerning the Son, no one would have taken Him as Divine as they do God. The phrase “the everlasting Father” does not prove that Jesus is the Father of the Lord Jesus Christ of the New Testament. All three persons in the Godhead, by virtue of being God, can all be called “the everlasting Father” or “giver of eternal life,” for this term has nothing to do with “Fatherhood” and “begetting” of a child, but to the peculiar idiomatic usage as stated above. All three persons could not be “the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,” for only one could be the Son and only one could be the Father, as we have already seen.

III. Other Proofs in the Old Testament of Three Persons in the Godhead

  1. 1 In the very beginning God used plural names and plural verbs and pronouns of the Godhead (See Point I, 1, above). He has also revealed the Godhead as consisting of several persons, as seen in Point 2, below. Many plain statements of two and three persons in the Godhead are found in Scripture. In Gen. 3:22 He plainly said, “The man is become as one of us.” The phrase “as one of” means “like each person of several persons of the same kind,” as proven wherever “as one of” is found in Scripture Genesis 19:14Genesis 42:27Genesis 49:16Exodus 12:48Leviticus 19:34Leviticus 24:22Numbers 12:122 Samuel 13:132 Samuel 14:13Job 12:4Job 13:9Job 19:11Job 29:25Psalms 119:162Mark 1:22Mark 6:15Mark 9:26. No person could use such a phrase and not refer to more than one person who could make “us.” If God refers to the Godhead as “us” here and elsewhere, we certainly ought to have enough sense to believe that He knows what He is talking about and forget the idea of only “one person.” Many other examples will be given in the following points.
  1. 1 Theophanies or appearances of God to men prove plurality of persons. Two and three persons called “Lord” and “God” are seen at the same time and at the same place, so the deity must be as many persons as are clearly seen. Each has been seen with a separate body and separate acts as in the case of other persons, as is clear from the following points:

(1) God appeared to Abraham in Gen. 18, and in Gen. 19:24 this “Lord” who was in visible form before Abraham rained fire upon Sodom “From the Lord [another one] out of heaven.”

(2) Two are seen with the eyes as two separate persons with two separate bodies in Dan. 7:9-14; “the ancient of days” sitting on a throne and “one like the Son of man” coming with the clouds of Heaven down to where the other one was on the throne, and the one on the throne gave to the Son of man a kingdom. One reading of this passage by any honest person will prove to him that there are two separate persons referred to. The one sitting on the throne had to have a body, or He could not sit down, and He could not wear clothes or have hair on His head. He is referred to as a real person in the same sense that others are. Seven times personal singular pronouns are used of Him. God was actually seen by the prophet, or he told a lie. If we cannot believe the writers of the Bible, then we cannot believe the Book itself.

The fact that a literal description is given of God as a person is proof that He is a real person. He was seen bodily; He sat on a seat; He had clothes on; He had a head, and hair on His head; He had a throne and personal attendants, ministers, and subjects standing around Him; and He sat in judgment like any other judge. Also literal books of record were opened before Him as at any court trial. The Son of man was brought before Him as any other person could be, and He gave to the Son of man a kingdom to reign over forever, thus proving that He was a separate person from the Son of man. He had a body and the Son of man had a body, or both could not have been seen coming before each other bodily. Shall we deny such plain, literal passages giving actual descriptions of both God and the Son of man? Shall we reject the Bible in part or in whole just for the sake of holding on to man-made ideas and theories about God? To me, such a program is rebellious and sinful, and it is confusing if we want a simple understanding of the Bible.

(3) Two separate persons are clearly seen and referred to in Zech. 1:7-21, where “the angel of the Lord” and “the Lord of Hosts” are talking together. The Lord of Hosts commands this angel what to say to Israel. This angel is also called “the Lord” in Zech. 1:19-20; 2:1-13. The one “Lord” says to Israel, “And ye shall know that the Lord of Hosts hath sent me . . . for, lo, I come, and I will dwell in the midst of thee, saith the Lord . . . and thou shalt know that the Lord of Hosts hath sent me unto thee” Zechariah 2:8-13. Here we have two Lords, one called “the Lord” and the other called “the Lord of Hosts” who sends “the Lord” to Israel. The angel, or “the Lord” refers to Himself as Me and to the Lord of Hosts as His and He Zechariah 2:8-11. In the other chapters of Zechariah the Lord of Hosts continues to use the angel as a spokesman until at the end of the book He is called by the Lord of Hosts “my shepherd” and “the Man that is my fellow” Zechariah 13:6-7. This angel is called “mine angel” in Exod. 23:20-23; 32:34; 33:8; and Num. 20:6, so He could not be the same person as the Lord of Hosts Himself.

(4) Three separate and distinct persons are seen and heard in Mt. 3:16-17. When Jesus (one person) was baptized the Spirit of God (another person) was seen manifesting Himself in bodily shape like a dove and descending upon Him, and at the same time these two were seen by the same eyes at the same place, the voice of the Father (another person distinct from both Jesus and the Spirit) was heard from Heaven saying, “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” If two persons were seen on Earth and one was heard from Heaven, then there must be three separate and distinct persons in the Godhead.

See also Jn. 1:31-34, where we find that John did not know Jesus, but he did know the Father who had sent Him. John said, “I knew him [Jesus, one person] not: but he [the Father, another person] that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God.”

(5) Two are seen and heard in Mt. 17:5: “While he [Jesus] yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him.” Years later Peter made it clear that the voice that they heard on this occasion was the actual voice of “the Father . . . from the excellent glory” and “from heaven” 2 Peter 1:16-17. Peter here states that those that were with him on the holy mount “were eyewitnesses of his majesty” and that “we heard” this voice from Heaven at the same time we saw Jesus in visible form on the Earth, so there must be at least two persons in the Godhead. Not only did three disciples see and hear two persons on the mount, but on another occasion multitudes of people saw and heard these same two persons. Jesus said, “Father, glorify thy name. Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again. The people therefore, that stood by, and heard it, said that it thundered: others said, An angel spake to him. Jesus answered and said, This voice came not because of Me, but for your sakes” John 12:26-33.

(6) Two separate and distinct persons were seen by Stephen in Acts 7:54-60 and a third is referred to as filling him: “But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked steadfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God. And said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God.” Stephen had to see both God and Christ in order to see Jesus standing at God’s right hand. God has to be a separate person from the Son in order for them to be standing and sitting side by side as stated here and in Mk. 16:19; Rom. 8:34; Col. 3:1; Heb. 1:3; 10:12; 12:2; 1 Pet. 3:22; Acts 2:33. These passages cannot possibly be understood in connection with one person, and all theories that will not teach two persons seen in these Scriptures are plainly of the devil and are out of harmony with the Word of God.

(7) Two are seen and referred to in Rev. 6:16; 7:9-17; Rev. 21:22; 22:3. In these passages we have statements of the wrath of God “that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb . . . before the throne, and before the Lamb . . . Salvation to our God which sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb . . . the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb” and “the throne of God and of the Lamb,” all proving that God and the Lamb are two different persons. In fact human language means nothing if we do not take it to mean exactly what it says.

(8) Two and three separate and distinct persons are clearly seen and referred to in many passages. In Lessons Twenty-one and Twenty-five there are scores of plain references to the Bible concerning one person of the Godhead speaking to and of other members of the deity. The following are a few passages which prove this point:

“I seek not mine own will, but the will of Him that sent me. If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true. There is another that beareth witness of me; and I know that the witness which he witnesseth of me is true . . . ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape” John 5:30-37; “I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter . . . the Spirit of truth which proceedeth from the Father . . . I will send unto you from the Father”’ John 14:14-17, 26John 15:25-26John 16:7-15; “He shall not speak of himself . . . He shall glorify me” John 16:13-15; “If I go not away, the Comforter will not come” John 16:7; “And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him” Matthew 12:31-32; “Father, glorify thou me with thine own glory which I had with thee before the world was . . . thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world” John 17:5, 24; “The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise . . . as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself” John 5:17-27.

(9) Three separate persons are seen and definitely symbolized in Rev. 4:2-8; 5:1-7. One person is seen on the throne; one person is symbolized by a “Lamb” who takes a book out of the hand of Him who sits on the throne; and a third person is symbolized by “seven lamps of fire” and “seven horns” and “seven eyes,” which are the seven spirits of God. This symbolizes the fullness of the one Holy Spirit upon Jesus Christ John 3:34Acts 10:38Isaiah 11:1-2Isaiah 42:1-5Isaiah 61:1-2Luke 4:16-21.

(10) Two persons are seen and referred to in Rev. 10-11. The angel is Christ because of the description and because He says in Rev. 11:3 that the two witnesses were “my two witnesses.” The other person was God in Heaven on the throne, to whom this one on Earth raises a hand and swares to Him that delay should be no longer.

  1. 1 The phrases “the Spirit of God” and “the Spirit of the Lord” and like expressions prove more than one person, for the Spirit could not be “of” or “from” God unless there was a God left behind who sends the Spirit. The Spirit could not be “from” the Lord and still be the Lord left behind after the Spirit is sent from Him. The God who is left behind is a person, for He thinks, wills, and acts as a person, and the Spirit that came from God is also a person, for He also thinks, wills, and acts as a separate person from the one who sent Him. Over 272 passages prove the Spirit to be a self-acting person from the Father and Son, as we have seen in Lesson Twenty-five.
  1. 1 Psalm 2 clearly reveals two and three separate and distinct persons: David by the Holy Spirit (one person) speaks in Ps. 2 of two other persons. He says that the people would be gathered together “against the Lord [one person], and against his anointed” [another person]. Plural pronouns are used of “the Lord” and “his anointed,” proving them to be two persons; “Let us [the people] break their bands . . . their cords from us . . . Yet have I [the Lord, one person] set my king [the Messiah, another person] upon my holy hill of Zion.” Then the Messiah answers His Lord, “I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.” Then the Lord answers the people, “Serve, the Lord . . . Kiss the Son, lest he be angry.” All Bible writers who spoke of God having a Son always made it clear that God Himself who promised the Son was not going to be that Son, as seen in Lesson Twenty-one, Point VI.

Christ is referred to again in Ps. 132:11-18 as the Lord’s “anointed” and as “the horn of David” who was to sit on David’s throne and reign forever Luke 1:32-35. In 1 Sam. 2:3-10, 27-36 Christ is called the Lord’s “king” and the Lord’s “anointed.” We are to understand these passages in the same literal sense that we do of other anointed men, such as “the priests” Leviticus 4:3-16Leviticus 6:22; “Saul” 1 Samuel 12:3-51 Samuel 24:6-10; “David” 1 Samuel 16:62 Samuel 19:212 Samuel 23:1; “Abraham,” “Isaac,” and “Jacob” Psalms 105:9-15; “Cyrus” Isaiah 45:1, and “the nation of Israel” Habakkuk 3:13. There must be two persons for anyone to be anointed—the one doing the anointing and the one being anointed; so if Christ is the anointed of the Father, He could not be the same person as the Father.

  1. 1 Psalm 8 with Heb. 2:5-18 speaks of two persons: “Thou [one person] hast made him [the Messiah] a little lower than the angels.”
  1. 1 Psalm 16:8-10 with Acts 2:25-36 proves two persons, for one is on the right hand of the other, one did not leave the other in Hell, or suffer His flesh to see corruption in the grave. Jesus is now on the right hand of the Father, and the Father is on the left hand of the Son, and this could never be unless there were two separate persons Psalms 16:8-10Psalms 110:1, 5Matthew 22:44Matthew 26:64Acts 2:33-34Acts 7:54-56Romans 8:34Ephesians 1:20Colossians 3:1Hebrews 1:3, 13Hebrews 8:1Hebrews 10:12Hebrews 12:21 Peter 3:22Revelation 22:3.
  1. 1 In Ps. 22:1-22 we have the Messiah talking to another person and calling Him “God” and “my God” and in every statement referring to Him as a separate person. This was fulfilled with two persons Matthew 27:35, 39Hebrews 9:14Hebrews 10:5-12.
  1. 1 Psalm 40:6-10 with Heb. 10:5-7 proves two persons: the Son, who came to do the will of the Father, and the Father Himself, who made a body for the Son.
  1. 1 Psalm 45:6-7 with Heb. 1:8-9 proves two persons: the Son, who is “anointed” and blessed above His fellows, and the Father Himself, who blesses the Son. Both are called “God,” but one “God” blessed and anointed the other “God.”
  1. 1 Psalm 89:19, 27-37 and 132:11-18 speaks of two persons: the Messiah—who is God’s “holy one,” God’s “one that is mighty,” God’s “one chosen out of the people,” God’s “first-born,” “the horn of David,” “mine anointed,”—and God Himself.
  1. 1 Psalm 110:1, 5 speaks of two Lords. (See Point IV, 3, below.)
  1. 1 Proverbs 30:4 speaks of two persons: one the Father and one the Son, and each has a name separate from that of the other, “What is his [the Father’s] name, and what is his Son’s name, if thou canst tell?” The Son’s name then is not that of the Father and the Father’s name is not that of the Son.
  1. 1 The prophets speak of the Messiah as “the branch of [from] the Lord” (Isa. 4); “a righteous Branch, and a King . . . his name shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS” Jeremiah 23:5-8; “the Branch of righteousness” Jeremiah 33:14-26; “my servant the BRANCH” Zechariah 3:8-10; and “the man whose name is the BRANCH” Zechariah 6:12-13. These passages clearly prove two persons: the Father, who was to raise up this “Branch” and “King” to be His servant, and the Son, who is to fulfill these passages and reign under the Father until all enemies are put down; then the Son Himself will deliver His kingdom to the Father who becomes supreme over this rebellious part of the universe, as He is now the head of Christ 1 Corinthians 11:31 Corinthians 15:24-28Isaiah 9:6-7Daniel 2:44-45Daniel 7:9-14Matthew 24:29-31Matthew 25:31-462 Thessalonians 1:7-102 Thessalonians 2:8-12Isaiah 32:1-5Ezekiel 43:7Luke 1:32-35Revelation 5:9-10Revelation 11:15Revelation 19:1-21Revelation 20:1-10.
  1. 1 In Isa. 10:16-17 the Lord of Hosts is spoken of as having a Holy One, called “his Holy One.” This proves two persons, for the Lord of Hosts is one person, and “his Holy One” must also be a person. The Lord of Hosts could not be “his Holy One,” and “his Holy One” could not be the Lord of Hosts.
  1. 1 In Isa. 11:1-2; 42:1-5; 61:1-2 we have clear references to three persons: the Lord Himself (one person), who was to send the Spirit (another person) upon the Messiah (still another person). When fulfilled two persons were seen with the natural eyes, and the third person (the Father) spoke from Heaven concerning the Son, while the Holy Ghost descended upon the Son Matthew 3:16-17Luke 4:16-21John 1:31-34.
  1. 1 Isaiah 22:16 speaks of two persons: one (the Father), who was to lay the “stone,” and the “stone” itself, which is a symbol of Christ, who is another person 1 Peter 2:5-8.
  1. 1 Isaiah 42:1-7 refers to three persons: God the Father Himself (the first person), who was to have a “servant,” called here “my servant” and “mine elect in whom my soul delighteth [the second person], I have put my spirit [the third person] upon him; he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.” God Himself, the Servant of God, and the Spirit make three persons.
  1. 1 In Isa. 48:16 we have another clear reference to three persons: “The Lord God [one persons, and His Spirit [another person], hath sent me [Jesus, another person].”
  1. 1 In Isa. 49:1-10 two persons are referred to: “The Lord [one person] hath called me [the Messiah] from the womb . . . he made mention of my name. And he hath made my mouth like a sharp sword . . . his hand hath hid me . . . And said to me, Thou art my servant, O Israel [Jesus is here called Israel, or a man that has power with God, as Jacob in Gen. 32:28] . . . [He] that formed me from the womb to be his servant; to bring Jacob again to him . . . yet shall I be glorious in the eyes of the Lord, and my God shall be my strength. And He said . . . Thou shouldst be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved of Israel; I will give thee to the Gentiles, that thou mayest be for salvation unto the end of the Earth. Thus saith the lord, the Redeemer of Israel, and his Holy One, to him whom man despiseth, to him whom the nation abhorreth, to a servant of rulers . . . he shall choose thee . . . I will preserve thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, to establish the earth, to cause to inherit the desolate heritages. That thou mayest say to the prisoners, Go forth.” What could be more clear than that two persons, the Father and the Son, are referred to in these statements?
  1. 1 Isaiah 50:4-11 refers to two persons: “The lord God [one person] hath given me [the Messiah] the tongue of the learned, that I may know how to speak . . . he wakeneth mine ear to hear . . . The Lord God hath opened mine ear, and I was not rebellious . . . I gave my back to the smiters, and my cheeks to them that plucked off the hair: I hid not my face from shame and spitting. For the Lord God will help me.” This prophecy was fulfilled in Mt. 26:67; 27:30; Mk. 14:65; 15:19; Heb. 10:5-10.
  1. 1 Isaiah 52:13–53:12 refers to two persons: “Behold my [the Father’s] servant shall deal prudently, he shall be exalted and be very high . . .his form was marred more than the sons of men . . . He shall grow up before him . . . he hath no form nor comeliness . . . he is despised . . . he hath borne our sorrows . . . we did esteem him smitten of God . . . The Lord [one person] hath laid on him [another person] the iniquity of us all . . . it pleased the Lord to bruise him . . . I [the Lord] will divide him a portion with the great . . . he bare the sin of many . . . thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin.” What simple language referring to two persons: the Lord and His servant, whom the Lord made an offering for sin!
  1. 1 In Isa. 59:19-21 we have a clear reference to three persons: In verse 19 we have the Holy Spirit as a self-acting, intelligent person, whose work it is to raise up a standard against the enemy; in verse 20 we have the Messiah in His second advent to the Earth to reign, and save Israel; and in verse 21 we have the Father as the third self-acting, intelligent person, who is going to make a covenant with Israel. Note the phrase “As for me,” which was made after the work of the first two had been outlined. The Father promised the Spirit to raise up a standard in verse 19 and the Son to come back to Zion in verse 20 but “As for me saith the Lord” I will make a covenant with Israel when the Redeemer comes to Zion.” Thus it is clear that the Father is one person and He is speaking concerning two other persons—the Son and the Holy Spirit.
  1. 1 In Isa. 62:11 two persons are referred to: the God, who proclaims to the world that Zion’s “salvation cometh,” and the salvation itself, which is none other than the person of Jesus Christ Luke 1:69Luke 2:30Luke 3:6Acts 4:12.
  1. 1 In Isa. 63:1-14 three persons are referred to: the Messiah, whose second advent is foretold in verses 1-6 and two other persons, “the Lord” (verse 7) and “his [the Lord’s] Holy Spirit” (verse 10), of whom He spoke in verses 7-14.
  1. 1 In Mic. 5:1-5 we have two persons referred to: the Messiah who is called here “the judge of Israel” and “ruler in Israel,” who was to come “forth unto me” (the Lord, another person) from the tribe of Judah and “stand and feed in the strength of the Lord, in the majesty of the name of the Lord his God.” The Lord was the “God” of the Messiah, who was to come from Judah and rule for “the Lord his God.”
  1. 1 Zechariah 12:10 refers to three persons: “I [the Father] will pour upon the house of David . . . the Spirit of grace [the Holy Spirit, another person] . . . and they shall look upon me [Him, the Messiah, as found in many MSS. and as translated in the rest of the verse and in Zech. 13:6] whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him . . . and shall be in bitterness for him.” Thus God (one person) foretells how He was going to send the Holy Spirit (another person) upon Israel, who would cause them to repent and accept the Messiah (another person) and mourn for him . . . look upon him whom they crucified . . . mourn for him . . . and be in bitterness for him.
  1. 1 Zechariah 13:6-7 refers to two persons, and both are called “Lord.” In verse 6 the Lord speaks of what Israel will say concerning the Messiah when they see Him. In Verse 7 the Lord (the Father) calls the Messiah “my shepherd” and “the man that is my fellow, saith the Lord of Hosts: smite the shepherd [my shepherd, not me] and the sheep will be scattered: and I [the Lord of Hosts] will turn mine hand upon the little ones.” Christ is the “shepherd” Matthew 26:31, 67Mark 5:19; so He could not be the other person called “the Lord of Hosts.” If the Lord calls Christ “my fellow,” then there are two separate fellows.

The Hebrew word for “fellow” is awmeeth, from a primitive root “to associate with,” “companionship,” “comrade,” “kindred man,” or “another fellow.” It proves that there is more than one person in the Godhead. This “shepherd” was a fellow God, another God, a comrade, an associate and a kindred of the Lord of Hosts. This is the only place where this Hebrew word is translated “fellow,” but the way it is translated elsewhere proves that it refers to another person of the same kind as the Lord. It is translated “another” Leviticus 19:11Leviticus 20:10Leviticus 25:17; “neighbor” Leviticus 6:2Leviticus 19:15, 17Leviticus 24:19Leviticus 25:14-15 and “neighbor’s” Leviticus 18:20Leviticus 25:14. If Christ is a fellow God with the Lord of Hosts, then we would have to believe in two persons called “God.”

Thus the Old Testament abundantly teaches a Trinity of persons in the “one God.” Many scores of other passages as clear as the above could be given to prove the doctrine of the Trinity, but these are enough to prove that there are three persons in the Godhead.

IV. Other New Testament Proofs of Three Separate Persons in the Godhead

  1. 1 Jesus Christ is called “the Son of Abraham,” “the Son of David,” “the Son of Man,” “the Son of Mary,” and “the Son of God” Matthew 1:1Matthew 8:20Mark 1:1Mark 6:3. Jesus is just as much a separate person from His God and Father as He is from Abraham, David, and His mother Mary. If He could not be the Son of God except by the Father incarnating Himself in Jesus, then it is just as sensible to believe He could not be the Son of these other persons except by incarnation. He is called “only begotten Son” of the Father and therefore could not be the Father John 1:14, 18John 3:16Romans 1:1-4Romans 8:29, 32Hebrews 1:1-91 John 5:1-18.
  1. 1 Many statements are made in the New Testament that clearly distinguish between the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost. These statements are utterly irreconcilable if we force a meaning into them of only one person, but how simple and how clear they are when we understand that two and three persons are referred to. Scores of plain statements are given in Lesson Twenty-one, Point V, proving that Jesus Christ is a separate and distinct person from the Father. In Lesson Twenty-five, Point III, there are many proofs that the Holy Ghost is a separate and distinct person from both the Father and the Son. The following are a few more proofs not given in the other lessons that prove that Jesus Christ is not the Holy Ghost.

Jesus Christ is Not the Holy Ghost

(1) In Lk. 4:1 we read of Jesus being filled with the Holy Ghost. There must be a difference between them in order to understand this statement. We must understand it in the same sense as we do when it is said that others were filled with the Spirit. Shall we say that Jesus was filled with Himself and that He was setting an example to believers to be full of self, or shall we say, when other people are filled with the Holy Ghost, that they become the Holy Ghost when they become filled with Him? There is just as much difference between Jesus and the Holy Spirit as there is between believers and the Spirit when they become filled with the Holy Ghost.

(2) Jesus emptied Himself in order to be filled with the Holy Spirit, so if He were the Holy Ghost He would have already been filled with Himself, and this self-emptying would not have been necessary. In Lesson Twenty-one and in Point 19 below it is clear that it became necessary for Him to empty Himself to be filled with the Spirit, thus proving that He is not the Holy Ghost.

(3) In Isa. 11:2; 42:1-5; 61:1-2; Mt. 12:18-21 we read that the Holy Ghost was to be put upon Jesus and rest upon Him. How could Jesus be the Holy Ghost and rest upon Himself and put Himself upon Himself?

(4) In Mt. 3:16-17 John saw the Spirit descending upon Jesus. Did he see Jesus descend upon Himself?

(5) In Mt. 4:1 we read of the Spirit leading Jesus into the wilderness to be tempted. Are we to understand that Jesus was the Holy Ghost leading Himself to be tempted?

(6) In Mt. 12:28 we read of Jesus casting out demons by the Holy Spirit. Are we to understand that He cast them out by Himself and thus contradict other Scriptures which say that He could not and did not do anything of Himself as stated in Lesson Twenty-one, Point V, 31?

(7) In Mt. 3:16-17 we see the Spirit descending in bodily shape like a dove upon Jesus, who had a human body. How could He be the Holy Ghost and be a real human being on Earth and at the same time descend from Heaven upon Himself as a Spirit?

(8) In Mt. 1:18-25; Lk. 1:35 it is stated that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Ghost and by the Spirit overshadowing Mary and coming upon her. Shall we understand this to mean that Jesus Himself was the Holy Ghost coming upon Mary to conceive Himself?

(9) In Lk. 2:25-35 we read of the Holy Ghost upon Simeon revealing to Him that he would not die before he had seen God’s salvation. Shall we believe that Jesus was the Holy Spirit upon Simeon revealing something about Himself and also at the same time believe that He was a little human baby in the arms of Simeon? Could the Holy Ghost be a Spirit-being and be a human being at the same time?

(10) In Jn. 14:16-17, 26; 15:26; 16:7-15 we read that it was necessary for Jesus to go back to Heaven to send the Holy Spirit. Shall we understand this to mean that it was not necessary for Him to go and send the Spirit and that He was already here as the Holy Ghost, and shall we understand that He was going to send Himself from Himself when He went to Heaven?

(11) In Jn. 3:34 we read of God giving the Holy Spirit without measure to Jesus. Shall we believe that this means that He was both God the Father and God the Holy Spirit and that He gave Himself to Himself without measure?

(12) In Lk. 24:39 Jesus claims that He was not a Spirit-being. Shall we make Him a liar and say that He was God, who is “Spirit” John 4:24, and that He was the Holy Spirit Himself? This would make the human Jesus Christ to be more than what He claimed to be and less than what God the Father and God the Holy Ghost really are. This would make all the Godhead a human being and as not existing in any form outside of the body of Jesus. Who then ran the universe and carried on God’s business in Heaven while all of God was in the womb of Mary and during His earthly life—and when he was dead for three days?

(13) In Jn. 7:37-39; Acts 2:33-34 we read that the Holy Ghost could not be given before Jesus was glorified. Jesus was given to men before He was glorified; so how could He be the Holy Ghost given to men before He could be given?

(14) In Acts 8:5-20 we read of men receiving Jesus before they received the Holy Ghost. How could this be if He were the same as the Holy Ghost?

(15) In Acts 10:38 we read of Jesus being anointed with the Holy Ghost to heal. Shall we understand that He was anointed with Himself?

These are just a few of many scores of foolish and illogical and unscriptural beliefs we would have to accept if Jesus and the Holy Ghost were the same.

  1. 1 Jesus taught that there were three persons in the Godhead in Mt. 22:43-45. He spoke of the Spirit (one person) in David speaking of two Lords sitting side by side: “The Lord [one Lord, the Father who spoke by the prophets, Heb. 1:1-3] said unto my Lord, [another Lord, who was David’s son in the flesh], Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool.” This is quoted from Ps. 110:1, and is the Lord’s own sanction of the doctrine of more than one Lord in the Godhead. (See Point III, 6, above.)
  1. 1 Several times Jesus is spoken of as having been with God and of God being with Jesus John 1:1-2John 3:2John 8:13-19, 29John 16:32Acts 10:38. The Greek word pros means “in company with” and “having companionship with” and could not be used unless there were two separate persons as there are in other situations of which it is used John 1:39John 3:22, 26John 4:9. If both the Father and the Son are spoken of as with each other, they must be two separate persons.
  1. 1 John speaks of both the Father and Son each having a “bosom,” thus proving two persons John 1:18John 13:23John 21:20. Jesus-only people teach that the Father was inside of Jesus incarnated, but Jn. 1:18 speaks of the Son being in the bosom of the Father, which is just the opposite of this false teaching. Being in the bosom as in Jn. 13:23; 21:20 means being outside of the person as a separate person but having a close relationship with Him and being close to in fellowship and love with Him.
  1. 1 Acts 2:33-39 refers to three persons: It is said of Jesus (one person), “Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted and having received of the Father [another person] the promise of the Holy Ghost [a third person], he hath shed forth this [the Holy Ghost] which ye now see and hear.” Thus two persons stayed in Heaven sitting side by side, and the Holy Ghost (a third person) came from those two to take the place of Jesus among men.
  1. 1 In Acts 3:13-26 two persons are mentioned: one person called “God” who spoke from creation by the prophets Hebrews 1:1-3 through the Spirit 2 Peter 1:21 and another person called “Jesus Christ” who was sent by this God to bless Israel, and who is now on the right hand of this God, whom the Heavens must receive until the times of the restitution of all things. If Heaven must receive Jesus Christ until then, He could not possibly have come back as the Holy Ghost ten days later, as some teach.
  1. 1 Peter refers to three separate persons in Acts 4:8-12; 5:30-33: He was “full of the Holy Ghost” (one person), and he speaks of “The God of our fathers” (another person), who “raised up Jesus [the Son of the Father, and another person] . . . Him hath God exalted to be a Prince and Saviour . . . we are witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost [another witness and therefore another person] whom God hath given to them that obey him.” Peter here and in Acts 5:3-4 teaches that the Holy Ghost is a separate person, witness and God, from the Father and the Son, whom he was speaking about by the Holy Ghost. (See Point V, 32, Lesson Twenty-one and Point 22, below.)
  1. 1 In Acts 4:23-31 the whole Church recognizes three persons: They were “filled with the Holy Ghost” (one person) and “they lifted up their voice to God” (another person, in Heaven) and told God about what David had said about the people gathering together against “God” and “his anointed One” (another person, the Messiah) and prayed for “God” to work “by the name of thy holy child Jesus.”
  1. 1 We have twenty-three other places in Acts where two and three persons are referred to. They are clear in themselves like the above examples; so the references are all that is needful to give here. Each one of them speaks of, and requires us to understand that two and three persons are referred to. They do not make sense if we try to understand them in connection with only one person Acts 8:15-24, 29Acts 9:1-17, 20Acts 10:38-48Acts 11:14-18, 24Acts 13:1-5, 17Acts 15:7-11, 19Acts 17:30-31Acts 19:1-7Acts 20:21-23, 28Acts 22:6-21Acts 26:6-23Acts 28:22-28.
  1. 1 In the introduction to all of Paul’s epistles he clearly distinguishes between “the Father” and “the Son” and “the Holy Ghost” Romans 1:1-4, 71 Corinthians 1:32 Corinthians 1:3Galatians 1:3Ephesians 1:2Philippians 1:2Colossians 1:21 Thessalonians 1:12 Thessalonians 1:21 Timothy 1:1-22 Timothy 1:1-2Hebrews 1:1-3.
  1. 1 Not only in the introduction of Paul’s epistles, but many times through the epistles He clearly distinguishes between the three separate persons of the Trinity (Rom. 5:1-11; 8:1-39; 9:4-5, 33; 10:9; 15:5-19, 30; 16:20; 1 Cor. 1:9, 24, 30; 2:10-12; 3:23; 5:9-11; 6:14; 8:6; 11:3; 12:3; 15:24-28, 57; 2 Cor. 1:19-22; 2:14-17; 3:3-4; 5:19-21; 11:4; 13:14; Gal. 1:15-16; 3:11, 19-20; 4:4, 7; Eph. 1:3-23; 2:4-7, 18-22; 3:5, 10-11, 13-21; 4:3-4, 30-32; 5:1-5, 17-20; 6:11-23; Phil. 1:8; 2:5-11; 3:14; 4:7, 19; Col. 1:12-24; 3:1, 17; 1 Thess. 3:11; 5:18-19; 2 Thess. 2:16; 1 Tim. 2:5; 2 Tim. 1:7; 4:1; Titus 2:13; 3:4-5; Heb. 2:3-4; 6:4-6; 7:14-25; 8:1; 9:14, 24; 10:5-31; 12:1-2, 22-24; 13:20).
  1. 1 The other apostles in the introduction to their epistles also clearly distinguish between the three persons of the Trinity James 1:11 Peter 1:2-32 Peter 1:1-21 John 1:1-7Revelation 1:1-6.
  1. 1 In other parts of their writings they also make the same distinction (1 Pet. 1:10-21; 2:3-5; 3:18-22; 5:10; 2 Pet. 1:16-21; 1 Jn. 2:1, 22-24; 3:8, 23-24; 4:15; 5:5-20; Jude 20-24; Rev. 2:27-29; 3:5-6, 12-13, 21-22; 4:2-5; 5:1-13; 7:9-17; 11:15; 12:10; 14:1, 4, 12-13; 20:6; 21:22-27; 22:1-5).

In all the 117 separate passages cited above in the last four points try to interpret or understand them to refer to only one person and note the results. One would have to be a better biblical magician than Satan has yet raised up to change these passages to make sense with only one person. Repeatedly one will find phrases like “peace from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ,” “God even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,” “the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,” “from God the Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father,” and “from him which is, and which was, and which is to come; and from the seven Spirits which are before his throne; and from Jesus Christ.” Are these statements of only one person? If so, the following also expresses only one person: This is a gift from John and from James and from George. Anyone knows that all such statements refer to three persons. Not one time do we have a statement like this: “From the Father, who is Jesus, and the Holy Ghost, or from Jesus, who is the Father and the Holy Ghost.” All three persons in the Godhead are always clearly distinguished from each other in all Scriptures.

  1. 1 The words “through” and “by,” used of Christ and the Holy Spirit only and never of the Father, prove the Father is the head of Christ and the Holy Spirit, working through and by them 1 Corinthians 3:231 Corinthians 11:3John 10:29John 14:28John 14:16-17, 26John 15:26John 16:7-15Acts 2:33-34. Note the following passages where certain acts were done “through Jesus Christ” Acts 4:2Romans 1:8Romans 5:1, 9Romans 7:25Romans 15:17Romans 16:271 Corinthians 15:572 Corinthians 3:4Galatians 3:14Galatians 4:7Galatians 5:10Ephesians 2:7, 18Philippians 4:7, 13Hebrews 13:211 Peter 1:221 Peter 4:111 John 4:9, “through the Holy Ghost” Acts 1:2Acts 21:4Romans 8:13Romans 15:13, 19Galatians 5:5Ephesians 2:22Hebrews 9:14, “by Jesus Christ” John 1:3, 10John 10:9Acts 4:10Acts 10:36Romans 2:16Romans 3:22Romans 5:17, 21Galatians 1:1Ephesians 1:5Ephesians 3:9Colossians 1:15-20Colossians 3:17Hebrews 1:1-31 Peter 2:51 Peter 5:10, and “by the Holy Spirit’’ Ezekiel 11:24Micah 3:8Zechariah 4:6Matthew 12:28Luke 2:27Luke 4:1Acts 11:28Romans 5:5Romans 15:191 Corinthians 2:101 Corinthians 6:111 Corinthians 12:3, 13. The Father must be a separate person from the Son or Spirit, or He could not do these things “through” and “by” them, and they must be separate persons from the Father, or they could not act as persons in doing all these things in the will of and at the command of the Father.
  1. 1 Paul said that “Christ was God’s and God was “the head of Christ” 1 Corinthians 3:231 Corinthians 11:3. So, if Christ is the one who is head, the whole Godhead, the only one person of God, and over all, Paul lied, and if he did not tell the truth on this point, how do we know but that many of his other statements are lies? Jesus taught the same doctrine that Paul did; so if Paul lied, Jesus did also, and if both were false teachers, then the whole Bible may be a lie and man has nothing to base faith and hope upon John 10:29John 14:28Acts 1:4-8. How could Jesus be the Father and these Scriptures be true? How could Jesus-only people be correct and these Scriptures be true? How could we believe both? That is impossible; so we better reject all theories that teach that Jesus is the Father and Holy Ghost and hold to the old faith and the old Book. Jesus not only taught that “the Father is greater than I” but also that both the Father and Son were greater in position than the Spirit, for the Spirit proceeds from them in obedience to them John 14:16-17, 26John 15:26John 16:7-15. Peter and others taught the same doctrine Matthew 3:11John 1:31-34Acts 2:33-34Acts 5:32Luke 11:13. The Old Testament also teaches that the Father is “head of all” Acts 3:212 Timothy 3:16-171 Corinthians 11:3.
  1. 1 The pronouns “himself,” “myself,” “ownself” and other terms that distinguish one person from another are used many times of each of the three persons in the Godhead. The word “himself” is used “of the Father” Matthew 6:4John 5:20, 26John 13:32John 16:27Acts 14:172 Corinthians 5:18-19Ephesians 1:5, 91 Thessalonians 3:11Hebrews 6:3Revelation 21:3; “of the Son” Matthew 8:17Luke 24:15, 27John 5:18-19, 26John 7:18Acts 1:3Romans 15:31 Corinthians 15:28Galatians 1:4Ephesians 2:20Ephesians 5:2, 25Hebrews 1:3; and “of the Holy Spirit” John 16:13Romans 8:15, 25. It is used of both the Father and Son in the same passages to distinguish between the two John 5:19-20John 17:5. The words “myself” and “himself” are used of the Father many times in the Old Testament, for He was the prominent speaker in the Old Testament. The word “myself” is used of the Father in Isa. 33:10; 42:14; 43:21; Jer. 22:5; 49:13; Ezek. 14:7; 20:5-9; 35:11; 38:23, and “himself” is used of Him in 1 Sam. 3:21; 10:19; 2 Chron. 13:12; Ps. 135:4, 14; Isa. 7:14; 8:13. The word “myself” is many times used of the Son in the Gospels, for He was then the prominent speaker and worker present among men Luke 24:39John 5:31John 7:17, 28John 8:18, 28John 10:18John 12:49John 14:3, 10John 17:19. Jesus makes it very plain in these passages that He did not come of “myself” and that He could not and did not do anything “of myself.” The words “him” are also used of both the Father and the Son to distinguish them and to prove they are two separate persons Daniel 7:9-14.
  1. 1 In 1 Cor. 14:2, 28 Paul says speaking in tongues is by the Spirit and unto God. The Spirit must be a person or He could not speak and exercise personal traits or have personal acts. If He is a person, we know there are two persons, for the God He talks to must also be a person.

Paul, several times in distinguishing between the separate persons of the deity, said that there was “one God, the Father (thus defining whether he means the whole Godhead or one person of that Godhead), of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ [another one from the Father and the Spirit], by whom are all things, and we by him and one Spirit (a different one from the first two), by whom we have access unto the Father” 1 Corinthians 8:61 Corinthians 12:132 Corinthians 11:4Ephesians 2:18Ephesians 4:3-4. Here “one” in number is clear for three “ones” are mentioned in the same passages together as being distinct from each other, and each one is definitely defined and set apart from the others by qualifying statements. The first three “ones” of Eph. 4 (the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost) are distinguished as three separate persons just like the other four “ones” (One faith, one hope, one body, and one baptism) are distinguished from each other as four separate entities. One would have just as much right and it would be just as logical and scriptural to make one faith, one hope, one body, and one baptism all one thing as to make one God, the Father, one Lord Jesus Christ, and one Spirit just one person Ephesians 4:3-6. The true sense of this passage is that there are seven separate and distinct persons and things referred to and not just one person and one thing.

  1. 1 In Phil. 2:5-11 we have the fact stated that the second person of the Trinity, before He became man, was “in the form of God,” i.e., had a spirit-body as the Father and the Spirit each still has. He thought it not robbery to be equal to God, but humbled Himself and took human form to pay the penalty for man and redeem men to God. For this humiliation He was highly exalted on the right hand of the Father. The Greek word for “robbery” is harpadzo, “a thing to be grasped after.” It is translated “pluck” John 10:28-29; “catcheth” Matthew 13:19John 10:12; “caught up” 1 Thessalonians 4:17 and “pulling” (Jude 23). From these meanings of the word, we can see that Christ did not try to hold on to equality with God, but for an unselfish purpose was willing to lay aside His equality to become man to redeem. He laid aside His God body to take a human body, His immortality in body to become mortal, His Lordship to become a servant, His spirit-form to take human form, His omnipresence to be limited in presence like men, His omniscience to grow in knowledge and learn obedience like men, His omnipotence to receive power from the Spirit to do the works and will of God as required of all men, and other powers to be limited as a man to prove to men and set an example before them that by the same means of grace He used they can live the same life and do the same works that He did John 14:12. For proof of these claims see Lesson Twenty-one, Points IV and VII. Thus Phil. 2:5-11 definitely teaches two persons: one who humbled Himself and became man and another who still stayed in His God form and glory and who brought about the incarnation and ran the universe and again brought the humbled one back to His former glory and power John 17:5Matthew 28:18.
  1. 1 “In him dwelleth all the fullness of the Godhead bodily” Colossians 2:9. This is taken by some to mean that all of God dwelled in the body of Jesus and there was no person or any part of God existing outside of the body of Jesus. This is not the meaning of this passage at all, for there were two separate persons with their own bodies, souls, and spirits who still existed outside the body of Jesus, as we have seen. The true meaning is that all of God’s provision for man is in and through Jesus and came to man through the offering of the body of Jesus in sacrifice, thus meeting all the demands of God and the needs of man. It was for this purpose that His body was prepared Romans 7:41 Corinthians 11:24-29Ephesians 2:14-16Colossians 1:20-22Hebrews 10:5-101 Peter 2:24. It may be translated “In Him dwelleth all the fullness of the atonement bodily or the fullness of the Godhead sacrificially.” It is the only body the Godhead provided as a sacrifice for the lost world, and it is the only body provided among men for the Godhead to dwell in as a man Hebrews 2:9-18. All the blessings and “fullness of God” are provided for man by God’s being manifested in the flesh and dwelling in a human body John 1:17Romans 15:29Ephesians 1:23Ephesians 3:19Ephesians 4:13Colossians 1:19John 3:34John 7:37-39. That this idea of the fullness of God for man dwelling in and coming through Christ is the right one is stated by Paul in the very next verse: “And ye are complete in him,” or you have all God’s fullness by Him.
  1. 1 In 1 Tim. 2:5 Paul speaks of Christ as a “mediator” between God and man. No person can be a mediator between himself and another person. A mediator must be a separate person from the two persons he is to mediate between. It is used of Moses, who mediated the Old Testament between God and Israel Deuteronomy 5:5Galatians 3:19-20, and of Christ who mediated the New Testament between God and man, thus proving Christ to be a separate person from God the Father, as was Moses Hebrews 8:6Hebrews 9:15Hebrews 12:24. Some have made an attempt to prove that Jesus, the only personal God, left His own throne to mediate between Himself and man by a fairy tale of a king who left his throne and became his own mediator in trying to win a wife. If we have to prove Bible doctrines by fairy tales instead of Scripture, we have no proof. The meaning of “mediate” according to the Funk and Wagnall Dictionary is “To interpose between parties in order to reconcile them; to be intermediate; acting as an intervening agency between.” Webster says, “To be in the middle, or between two; to intervene; to interpose between parties as the equal friend of each.” This requires a separate person from the two at enmity. Thus if Jesus is the mediator between God and man, He could not be the God or the man, but He must be a separate person from each and a friend of both to try to reconcile them.
  1. 1 John definitely says, “there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost and these three are one 1 John 5:7-8. This proves them to be three separate persons or they could not be three witnesses. Three persons cannot be one except in unity. One person cannot be three persons or three persons cannot be one person in any sense. Any number above one implies plurality, and any number of persons can be one in unity John 17:11, 21. It does not say “there is one witness who bears record, but “there are three” and “these three are one.” Three what? Three parts of one person? NO! That is not the subject of John. It is three witnesses for bearing witness to the Sonship of Jesus is the whole subject of 1 Jn. 5:5-11, 13, 20. Both God and man demand more than one witness to confirm truth, as we have seen in Lesson Twenty-one, Point V, 31. Any set of three witnesses could not be just three parts of one person, for this would not be accepted in any court and would not meet the demands of God Himself, but they must be three separate persons to confirm anything. God the Father is a witness separate from both the Son and the Holy Spirit Jeremiah 29:23Malachi 3:5John 5:31-37Romans 1:9Hebrews 1:1Hebrews 2:3-4; God the Son is a witness separate from both the Father and the Holy Spirit Isaiah 55:4John 18:371 Timothy 6:13Revelation 1:5; and God the Holy Spirit is a witness separate from both the Father and the Son Romans 8:16John 15:26Hebrews 10:15. If all three are witnesses then all three must be separate persons. They must be separate persons, or they could not be called witnesses nor could each bear witness. No three parts of any one person could be called three separate witnesses; so if there be three witnesses they could not be anything else but three persons. Each witness to be accepted by God or man must be an intelligent free will capable of seeing, thinking, hearing, speaking, and acting. Only a responsible person could be a separate witness, or be any kind of witness to testify to facts.

When God said, “there are three that bear record [witness] in Heaven, the Father, the Word (Son, Jn. 1:14), and the Holy Ghost; and these three agree in one. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one,” He definitely said there were three separate persons and two separate things that bear witness in both Heaven and Earth. The Spirit bears witness in both places. In addition to two or three witnesses in any court there can be any number of things shown to confirm the testimony of the persons who are witnesses in the case. So here in addition to three persons (the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost), the “water” and the “blood” confirm the witness of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, that Jesus was and is the Son of God with a flesh body to atone for sin and fully redeem man to the Father. There are then three witnesses and two things that witness in Heaven and Earth to His Sonship.

The three witnesses are:

(1) The Father (one person, who begat the Son).

(2) The Word (the Son, who was begotten, Jn. 1:1-2, 14, 18; 3:16-18).

(3) The Holy Ghost Matthew 1:18-25.

The two things are:

(1) The water (referring to the water baptism of Christ when witness was given to Him by the Father speaking of Him from Heaven and the Spirit from Heaven descending upon the Son, Mt. 3:16-17; Jn. 1:31-34; 1 Jn. 5:6, 9).

(2) The blood (which was shed to seal and witness the New Testament, Mt. 26:28).

The phrases “these three are one” and “these three agree in one” mean the same thing as seen by like expressions in Scripture. In both cases the “three” are “one” in unity, or to one point; that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, not the Father or the Holy Ghost.

  1. 1 Many Scriptures speak of the Holy Ghost as a Spirit-Being and as a separate person from both the Father and the Son, all the time that Jesus was a human being on Earth and as a resurrected being since His ascension to Heaven. This distinction is clear from Lesson Twenty-five.
  1. 1 Many Scriptures speak of God as being a Spirit-Being and as a separate person from both the Son and the Holy Spirit. This is clear from Lessons Four, Twenty-one and Twenty-five.
  1. 1 Revelation 1:4-6; 4:1-8; 5:1-7 clearly reveals three separate persons in the Godhead, as we have already seen in Point III, 2 (9), above.

Over 500 Scriptures Proving a Divine Trinity

There are over 500 plain Scriptures that refer to the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, as being three separate and distinct persons, each with His own personal body, soul, and spirit in the sense that all other persons have them. Two and three persons must be understood in all the passages below if the plain language is to be understood as it reads, for first, second, and third personal pronouns are used in the singular and the plural in the same way that we use them in reference to other persons. If two and three persons are referred to in all these passages and they are called God, then we must understand them as referring to this many divine persons, as we do when the same statements are made of two or three persons of the human race. Note the following Scriptures:

Two persons are referred to in:

1. The Pentateuch: Gen. 1:26; 3:22; 11:7; 19:24; Exod. 14:19; 23:20-23; 32:34; 33:1-3; Num. 20:16; Deut. 18:15-19.

2. The historical books: Josh. 5:13-15; Judg. 2:1-5. The term, “the angel of the Lord” means “the angel from the Lord.” The Lord is one person and the angel that comes from Him is another person. Both persons are divine, for the angel proves to be God in many of these passages, and certainly the Lord who sends the angel is another divine person. See Lesson Six, VI, for many Scriptures where this term is found. Also, “the Spirit of the Lord” means “the Spirit from the Lord.” The Lord is one divine person and the Spirit, the Holy Spirit, from the Lord is another divine person Judges 3:10Judges 6:34Judges 11:29Judges 13:25Judges 14:6, 19Judges 15:141 Samuel 10:61 Samuel 16:13-142 Samuel 23:2. The same is true of the “Spirit of God” which is the Holy Spirit who was the agent of God and spake by the mouths of the prophets since the world began Hebrews 1:1-22 Peter 1:21.

3. The poetical books: Ps. 2:1-12; 8:3-6 with Heb. 2:5-8; Ps. 16:8-11; 22:1-31; 34:20; 45:6-7; 68:18; 69:8-9; 89:27; 110:1-5; 118:26; 119:97-104; 132:11, 17; Prov. 30:4.

4. The prophetic books: Isa. 7:14; 8:18 with Heb. 2:12-13; and Isa. 9:6-7; 11:1-5; 42:1-7; 49:1-12; 50:4-11; 52:13-15; 53:1-12; 55:4-5; 63:1-10; Jer. 23:5-8; Ezek. 33:15-18; 34:29; Dan. 7:9-14; Hos. 11:1; Mic. 5:1-6; Hab. 2:7; Zech. 6:12-13; 12:10; 13:6, 7; Mal. 3:1-3.

5. The Gospels: Mt. 1:18-20; 2:6, 15, 22; 5:44-48; 6:1-18; 7:21; 9:38; 10:32-33, 40; 11:10, 25-27; 12:18, 28, 31-32, 50; 14:33; 15:13; 16:27; 17:5; 18:10, 19, 35; 19:17; 20:23; 21:9, 16; 22:21, 42; 23:8-10, 39; 26:29, 39, 42, 44, 53, 63-64; 27:43, 46; Mk. 1:2, 8, 12, 24; 2:7; 3:11; 5:7; 8:38; 9:7; 11:25-26; 12:27; 14:36, 62; 15:34, 39; 16:19; Lk. 1:32-33; 2:11-14, 22, 38, 40, 49-52; 3:16; 4:1-14, 18, 41; 7:27; 10:21-22; 11:13; 12:5-10, 32; 16:13; 19:38; 20:35, 38, 39-44; 22:29; Jn. 1:1-3, 5, 14, 18, 29, 36; 2:16-17; 3:2, 16-17; 4:10; 5:17-45; 6:27-65; 7:16-18, 28-29, 33-39; 8:14-56; 9:3-5, 33; 10:15-18, 25-38; 11:4, 22, 27, 41-42; 12:26-28, 44-50; 13:1-3, 20, 31-32; 4:1-31; 15:1-25; 16:3-32; 17:1-26; 18:11; 20:17-23, 31.

6. The book of Acts: Acts 1:16; 2:22-39; 3:7-26; 7:59-60; 9:3; 13:17-41; 16:6-34; 17:18-31; 18:5, 24-28; 19:1-7; 22:14; 26:8-9, 18-23; 28:23-31.

7. The Pauline Epistles: Rom. 1:7-10, 16; 2:16; 3:22-26; 4:24; 5:1-21; 6:3-23; 7:25; 8:29-34; 14:10-12; 15:5-7; 16:20-27; 1 Cor. 1:1-9, 14-30; 3:9-15; 4:1-21; 5:1-13; 8:4-6; 10:4-31; 11:3; 14:2-33; 15:15, 24-28, 57; 2 Cor. 1:1-23; 2:17; 4:2-15; 5:18-21; 8:1-19; 9:7-15; 10:1-14; 11:1-11, 31; 12:1-12, 19-21; 13:4-7; Gal. 1:1-12, 15-24; 2:16-21; 3:13-29; 5:1-6; 6:14-18; Eph. 1:1-2; Phil. 1:26-30; 2:12-16; 3:3, 14; 4:5-23; Col. 1:1-2, 12-28; 2:2–3:17; 4:3-12; 1 Thess. 2:1-18; 3:8-13; 4:13-18; 2 Thess. 1:1-12; 2:1-12; 3:1-18; 1 Tim. 1:1-2, 11-17; 2:3-7; 5:21; 6:1-17; 2 Tim. 1:1-2; 2:1-26; 3:12-17; 4:1-2, 8-22; Titus 1:1-4, 7-16; 2:1-13; Phl. 1-25; Heb. 1:1-14; 2:5-18; 4:4-16; 5:1-14; 6:7-20; 7:1-26; 8:1-13; 9:24; 10:5-9, 19-23; 10:5-9, 19-23; 11:25-26; 12:2-3, 22-24; 13:4-21.

8. The General Epistles: Jas. 1:1; 2:1-5; 1 Pet. 1:5-9; 2:3-25; 4:1-11; 5:1-14; 2 Pet. 1:1-2; 2:1-4; 1 Jn. 1:1-7; 2:1-2, 22-25; 3:1-3, 8-10; 4:9-10; 5:1, 20-21; 2 Jn. 2; Jude 1, 4.

9. The Revelation: Rev. 1:1-2; 2:7, 10-11, 16-18, 28-29; 3:14-16; 4:5-8; 5:1-11; 6:16-17; 7:9-17; 11:15; 12:10; 15:1-4; 17:14-17; 19:1-21; 20:4-6; 21:2-14, 22-23; 22:1-21.

Three persons are referred to in:

1. The Old Testament: Plural pronouns are used of God Genesis 1:26Genesis 3:22Genesis 11:7Psalms 2:3Isaiah 6:8. Elohim, the Hebrew word for “God” in 2,700 places, is a uniplural noun, meaning “Gods” and is so translated 239 times. See point I, 1, above.

Two persons called God are often referred to, as seen in points 1, 2, 3, and 4, above. Three persons are clearly referred to in Ps. 45:6-17; Isa. 10:20–12:6; 42:1-7; 48:16; 59:15-21; 61:1-3 with Lk. 4:18-21; Isa. 63:9-10; Zech. 3:8-9; 12:10–13:1.

2. The Gospels: Mt. 1:20-25; 3:9-17; 4:1-11; 12:18-21; 6:16-17; 22:42-46; 28:19-20; Mk. 1:10-11; 12:35-37; Lk. 1:32-35, 67-80; 2:25-35, 38; 3:22; 11:9-13; 24:49; Jn. 1:31-34; 3:34-36; 14:16-21, 23-26; 15:26; 16:7-17; 20:21-23.

3. The book of Acts: Acts 1:1-8; 2:17-21, 33-39; 4:8-12, 24-31; 5:30-32; 6:1-15; 7:1-53; 7:54-56; 8:5-23, 29-39; 9:5-20; 10:2-48; 11:15-25; 13:2-12, 46-52; 15:7-29; 18:24-28; 20:21-35.

4. The Pauline Epistles: Rom. 4:1-4; 5:1-5; 8:1-27; 9:1-5; 14:17-18; 15:8-30; 1 Cor. 2:1-15; 3:16-23; 6:9-19; 7:22-24, 40; 12:1-29; 2 Cor. 1:18-23; 3:3-18; 5:1-10; 6:1-18; 13:14; Gal. 3:1-11; 4:7; 5:16-26; 6:2-8; Eph. 1:3-21; 4:3-32; 5:1-21; 6:6-24; Phil. 1:1-19; 2:1-11; Col. 1:3-8; 1 Thess. 1:1-10; 4:1-18; 5:9-28; 2 Thess. 2:13-17; 1 Tim. 3:15-17; 4:1-10; 2 Tim. 1:6-14; Titus 3:4-7; Heb. 2:1-14; 3:1-12; 6:1-6; 9:6-14; 10:10-18, 26-31.

5. The General Epistles: 1 Pet. 1:1-4, 10-25; 3:15-22; 4:13-19; 2 Pet. 1:16-21; 1 Jn. 3:23-24; 4:2-3, 12-16; 5:5-11; Jude 20-21.

6. The Revelation: Rev. 1:4-6, 9-10; 3:1-13, 21-22; 4:1-3; 5:1-10; 11:3-13; 14:12-13; 19:1-10; 22:16-21.

Thus the whole Bible abundantly proves that there are three separate persons in the Godhead, or in the “one Lord” and “one God” or deity; that these three are in absolute unity and “are one” as believers are supposed to be John 17:11, 21; and that all three persons have their proper place in the creation and redemption of all things, and to each we owe honor and respect in all our worship and service to the Godhead.

Study Questions

Questions on Lesson Twenty-seven

Expand each question to enter the answer. These questions reinforce the key truths from this lesson.

1 Define “Elohim” and show how it proves a Trinity of persons in the Godhead.
2 Define “Yehovah” and state how it is translated in English.
3 Define “El,” “Eloah,” “Elyon,” and “Adon” and state how they are translated in English.
4 State how first, second, and third personal pronouns are used of God.
5 State when the separate persons of the Trinity were the prominent speakers for God.
6 What is meant when singular pronouns are used of the whole Trinity?
7 Give a few other names of God in the Old Testament.
8 Define “Theos,” “Kurios,” “Mesons,” and “Christos.”
9 Is the word “God” used of each member of the Godhead? Prove.
10 Which person of the Godhead is “Jesus” always the name of?
11 Was “Jesus” the name of any member of the Godhead from eternity? Prove.
12 To which of the three persons of the Godhead is the name “Christ” always applied?
13 When did Jesus become the Christ? Prove.
14 Give a few other names of Jesus as found in both Testaments.
15 How would we explain the fact that “Christ” was used of Jesus before He became Christ?
16 Can the terms “the Father” and “the Son” and “the Holy Ghost” be names? Explain.
17 Is the term “the Father” ever used in Scripture of Christ or the Holy Spirit?
18 To whom is it always applied and why?
19 Is the term “the Son” ever applied to the Father or the Holy Spirit? Why?
20 Is the term “the Holy Spirit” ever applied to the Father or the Son? Why?
21 Define the word “name.”
22 Does the phrase “in the name” have to be repeated before all three names in Mt. 28:19 in order to make good English? Illustrate.
23 Did God the Father ever address the Son by any other name than “Son”?
24 Did the Son ever address the Father by any other name than “Father”?
25 Did the disciples understand Jesus as referring to Himself when He said “Father”?
26 Did the disciples think Jesus referred to Himself when He spoke of “the Holy Ghost”?
27 Did any Bible writer ever refer to “the Father” and “the Son” and “the Holy Ghost” as being the same person?
28 How many times did they distinguish between them and how?
29 What does “in the name of” mean? What would “in the name of Jesus Christ” mean?
30 What would “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” mean?
31 Could such a Scripture possibly mean in the name of the Son only?
32 If we baptized only in the name of the Son would this not be an insult to the Father and the Spirit?
33 Would this not be in direct disobedience to Jesus Christ, the one who authorized us to baptize?
34 Would the apostles have any authority to change His command?
35 Explain how they would not have to change His command when they said “in the name of Jesus Christ”? Illustrate.
36 Is there one passage that says we are to baptize in the name of Jesus only?
37 Cannot both Matthew and Acts be obeyed? How?
38 Because all passages in Acts differ in wording do we have the authority to use one passage as the exact words in baptism and disregard the others?
39 Can one reject baptism according to Mt. 28:19 and still obey Christ?
40 How do the preposition “of” and the conjunction “and” prove a Trinity of persons?
41 Explain how Jesus could be called “the everlasting Father,” and what does it mean?
42 How do plural names and plural pronouns prove a Trinity?
43 Prove from Theophanies that there are two and three persons in the deity.
44 Give some examples in Scripture where two and three persons have been seen with the same eyes at the same time and at the same place.
45 Give some plain references in Scripture that require belief in a Trinity.
46 Give proof from Ps. 2; 8; 16; 22; 40; 45; 89 and 110 that there are two and three persons in the Godhead.
47 Give proof from Isa. 4; 10; 11; 22; 42; 48; 49; 50; 52; 59; 61; 62 and 63 that there are two and three persons in the Godhead.
48 Prove from Zech. 12:10 and 13:6-7 that there are two and three persons in the deity.
49 Prove from Mt. 1:1 that Jesus is a separate person from God the Father.
50 Give a number of proofs that Jesus is not the Holy Ghost.
51 Prove from Mt. 22:44-45 that there are at least two Lords.
52 How do the words “with” and “bosom” prove more than one person in the deity?
53 Give some proof in Acts 2; 3; 4 and other places in Acts that there are three persons in the Godhead.
54 Give a number of clear passages in Paul’s epistles proving that there is a Trinity.
55 Give a number of clear passages in the General Epistles (James—Jude) that prove a Trinity or three separate persons in the Godhead.
56 How do the words “through” and “by” prove a Trinity?
57 Prove from 1 Cor. 3:23; 11:3 that there is more than one in the Godhead.
58 When Jesus said that His Father was greater than He was, did He mean that He Himself was greater than Himself?
59 How are personal pronouns used in the New Testament of God, and how does this prove that there is more than one person in the Godhead?
60 How does 1 Cor. 14:2 and 28 prove more than one person in the Godhead?
61 How do Eph. 4:3-4; 1 Cor. 8:6; 11:3; 2 Cor. 11:4 and Eph. 2:18 prove a Trinity?
62 How does Paul distinguish between the different members of the Trinity?
63 How does Phil. 2:5-11 prove more than one person in the Godhead?
64 Explain Col. 2:9 and how could it be understood if the doctrine of a Trinity is true?
65 How does 1 Tim. 2:5 prove more than one person in the Godhead?
66 Give Scripture that definitely says that there are THREE separate persons and witnesses in the deity.
67 In what sense can THREE persons be ONE?
68 Can one person be three persons in any sense? Why?
69 Could God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit be three witnesses if they were the same person? Can one person be three witnesses? Why?
70 Would any court accept one person as three witnesses? Why?
71 How many witnesses has God always demanded to prove anything? Prove.
72 How many persons and things are mentioned in 1 Jn. 5:7 8 as witnesses? Name them.
73 What do they all testify to and what are they in agreement on?
74 Prove from Scripture that both the Father and the Holy Spirit were separate Spirit-beings or persons distinct from the Son.
75 How does Rev. 1:4-6; 4:1-8; 5:1-7 prove a Trinity?
76 Do both Testaments agree that there are three divine persons in the Godhead?